All models

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Relace Apply 3

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at $0.460 in and $4.60 out and Relace Apply 3 at $0.978 in and $1.44 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

Q

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen

0.6¢

for a client proposal

$0.460 in · $4.60 out / 1M

131K context · released September 2025

Full page →
R

Relace Apply 3

Relace

0.6¢

for a client proposal

$0.978 in · $1.44 out / 1M

256K context · released September 2025

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 1.2¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

  • Cheapest input: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at $0.460 per million tokens.
  • Cheapest output: Relace Apply 3 at $1.44 per million tokens.
  • Largest context: Relace Apply 3 at 256K tokens — about 370 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
0.32¢
Relace Apply 3
0.27¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
0.6¢
Relace Apply 3
0.6¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
needs 155K ctx
Relace Apply 3
$0.16

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
2.1¢
Relace Apply 3
3.6¢

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
needs 250K ctx
Relace Apply 3
$0.25

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output
free$0.64$1.290 tokens250k500k750k1000k
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Relace Apply 3

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Relace Apply 3
Input / 1M tokens
$0.460
$0.978
Output / 1M tokens
$4.60
$1.44

Specs

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Relace Apply 3
Provider
Released
September 2025
September 2025
Context window
131K
256K
Max output
33K
128K
Input
Text and Images
Text
Output
Text
Text
Reasoning
Shows its thinking
Answers directly
Knowledge cutoff
2025-03-31

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen

0.32¢

for this task

29% input · 71% output

Full pricing →

Relace Apply 3

Relace

0.27¢

for this task

73% input · 27% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.59¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 848 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, Relace Apply 3 has the largest context window here — 256K tokens.

On price, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is the cheapest of the two on a typical task, at about 0.6¢.

For images or files, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can read them directly; Relace Apply 3 is text-only.

If you want to watch the model think, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking shows reasoning; the other answers directly.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or Relace Apply 3?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at 0.6¢; Relace Apply 3 at 0.6¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

Relace Apply 3 — 256K tokens, about 370 pages.

Can I run Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and Relace Apply 3 side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 1.2¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 1.2¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.