All models

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at $0.265 in and $2.65 out and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking at $0.230 in and $2.76 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

Q

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen

0.34¢

for a client proposal

$0.265 in · $2.65 out / 1M

131K context · released July 2025

Full page →
Q

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen

0.34¢

for a client proposal

$0.230 in · $2.76 out / 1M

131K context · released October 2025

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.68¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

  • Cheapest input: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking at $0.230 per million tokens.
  • Cheapest output: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at $2.65 per million tokens.
  • Identical context windows: 131K tokens each.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
0.19¢
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
0.18¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
0.34¢
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
0.34¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
needs 155K ctx
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
needs 155K ctx

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
1.2¢
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
1.1¢

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
needs 250K ctx
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
needs 250K ctx

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output
free$0.37$0.740 tokens250k500k750k1000k
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input / 1M tokens
$0.265
$0.230
Output / 1M tokens
$2.65
$2.76

Specs

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Provider
Released
July 2025
October 2025
Context window
131K
131K
Max output
33K
Input
Text
Text and Images
Output
Text
Text
Reasoning
Shows its thinking
Shows its thinking
Knowledge cutoff
2025-06-30
2025-03-31

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen

0.19¢

for this task

29% input · 71% output

Full pricing →

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen

0.18¢

for this task

25% input · 75% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.37¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 1,354 of these.

Which should you pick?

On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is the cheapest of the two on a typical task, at about 0.34¢.

For images or files, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can read them directly; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is text-only.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking at 0.34¢; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at 0.34¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

They are identical — 131K tokens each, about 190 pages.

Can I run Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.68¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.68¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.