All models

Codestral 2508 vs GLM 4.6V

Codestral 2508 at $0.345 in and $1.03 out and GLM 4.6V at $0.345 in and $1.03 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

M

Codestral 2508

Mistral AI

0.26¢

for a client proposal

$0.345 in · $1.03 out / 1M

256K context · released August 2025

Full page →
Z

GLM 4.6V

Z.ai

0.26¢

for a client proposal

$0.345 in · $1.03 out / 1M

131K context · released December 2025

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.51¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

  • All 2 cost the same on input.
  • Largest context: Codestral 2508 at 256K tokens — about 370 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out
Codestral 2508
0.12¢
GLM 4.6V
0.12¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out
Codestral 2508
0.26¢
GLM 4.6V
0.26¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out
Codestral 2508
$0.06
GLM 4.6V
needs 155K ctx

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out
Codestral 2508
1.3¢
GLM 4.6V
1.3¢

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out
Codestral 2508
$0.09
GLM 4.6V
needs 250K ctx

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output
free$0.24$0.480 tokens250k500k750k1000k
Codestral 2508
GLM 4.6V

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

Codestral 2508
GLM 4.6V
Input / 1M tokens
$0.345
$0.345
Output / 1M tokens
$1.03
$1.03
Cached input / 1M
$0.035
$0.063

Specs

Codestral 2508
GLM 4.6V
Released
August 2025
December 2025
Context window
256K
131K
Max output
33K
Input
Text and Files
Images, Text, and Video
Output
Text
Text
Reasoning
Answers directly
Shows its thinking
Knowledge cutoff
2025-03-31

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

Codestral 2508

Mistral AI

0.12¢

for this task

57% input · 43% output

Full pricing →

GLM 4.6V

Z.ai

0.12¢

for this task

57% input · 43% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.24¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 2,070 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, Codestral 2508 has the largest context window here — 256K tokens.

On price they are identical: about 0.26¢ for a typical task each.

If you want to watch the model think, GLM 4.6V shows reasoning; the other answers directly.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or GLM 4.6V?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out) they cost the same — about 0.26¢ each. Compare them on context and capabilities instead.

Which has the largest context window?

Codestral 2508 — 256K tokens, about 370 pages.

Can I run Codestral 2508 and GLM 4.6V side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.51¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.51¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.