All models

Ling-2.6-1T vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Grok 4.20

Ling-2.6-1T at $0.086 in and $0.719 out, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct at $0.120 in and $0.478 out, and Grok 4.20 at $1.44 in and $2.88 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

I

Ling-2.6-1T

Inclusionai

0.1¢

for a client proposal

$0.086 in · $0.719 out / 1M

262K context · released 4 months ago

Full page →
Q

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen

0.1¢

for a client proposal

$0.120 in · $0.478 out / 1M

131K context · released October 2025

Full page →
x

Grok 4.20

xAI

0.95¢

for a client proposal

$1.44 in · $2.88 out / 1M

2M context · released 4 months ago

Full page →

Asking all three at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 1.1¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

  • Cheapest input: Ling-2.6-1T at $0.086 per million tokens.
  • Cheapest output: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct at $0.478 per million tokens.
  • Largest context: Grok 4.20 at 2M tokens — about 2,900 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out
Ling-2.6-1T
0.05¢
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
0.05¢
Grok 4.20
0.43¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out
Ling-2.6-1T
0.1¢
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
0.1¢
Grok 4.20
0.95¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out
Ling-2.6-1T
1.6¢
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
needs 155K ctx
Grok 4.20
$0.23

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out
Ling-2.6-1T
0.37¢
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
0.47¢
Grok 4.20
$0.05

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out
Ling-2.6-1T
2.4¢
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
needs 250K ctx
Grok 4.20
$0.74

Long-context rate applied at this input size.

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output
free$1.73$3.450 tokens250k500k750k1000k
Ling-2.6-1T
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Grok 4.20

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

Ling-2.6-1T
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Grok 4.20
Input / 1M tokens
$0.086
$0.120
$1.44
Output / 1M tokens
$0.719
$0.478
$2.88
Cached input / 1M
$0.017
$0.230
Web search
0.57¢ / search

Specs

Ling-2.6-1T
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Grok 4.20
Released
4 months ago
October 2025
4 months ago
Context window
262K
131K
2M
Max output
33K
33K
Input
Text
Text and Images
Text, Images, and Files
Output
Text
Text
Text
Reasoning
Answers directly
Answers directly
Shows its thinking
Knowledge cutoff
2025-09-01

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

Ling-2.6-1T

Inclusionai

0.05¢

for this task

32% input · 68% output

Full pricing →

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen

0.05¢

for this task

50% input · 50% output

Full pricing →

Grok 4.20

xAI

0.43¢

for this task

67% input · 33% output

Full pricing →

All 3, same prompt and context: 0.53¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 939 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, Grok 4.20 has the largest context window here — 2M tokens.

On price, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is the cheapest of the three on a typical task, at about 0.1¢.

For images or files, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct and Grok 4.20 can read them directly; Ling-2.6-1T is text-only.

If you want to watch the model think, Grok 4.20 shows reasoning; the others answer directly.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all three, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

Questions, answered

Which is cheapest — Ling-2.6-1T, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct, or Grok 4.20?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct at 0.1¢; Ling-2.6-1T at 0.1¢; Grok 4.20 at 0.95¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

Grok 4.20 — 2M tokens, about 2,900 pages.

Can I run Ling-2.6-1T, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct, and Grok 4.20 side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 3, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 1.1¢ for a typical task.

Ask all three at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 1.1¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.