ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B at $0.483 in and $1.44 out and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at $0.265 in and $2.65 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Baidu

0.36¢

for a client proposal

$0.483 in · $1.44 out / 1M

123K context · released June 2025

Full page →

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen

0.34¢

for a client proposal

$0.265 in · $2.65 out / 1M

131K context · released July 2025

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.7¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

Cheapest input: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at $0.265 per million tokens.
Cheapest output: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B at $1.44 per million tokens.
Largest context: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at 131K tokens — about 190 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

0.17¢

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

0.19¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

0.36¢

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

0.34¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

needs 155K ctx

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

needs 155K ctx

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

1.8¢

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

1.2¢

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

needs 250K ctx

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

needs 250K ctx

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Input / 1M tokens

$0.483

$0.265

Output / 1M tokens

$1.44

$2.65

Specs

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Provider

Baidu

Qwen

Released

June 2025

July 2025

Context window

123K

131K

Max output

16K

—

Input

Images and Text

Text

Output

Text

Reasoning

Shows its thinking

Knowledge cutoff

2025-03-31

2025-06-30

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Baidu

0.17¢

for this task

57% input · 43% output

Full pricing →

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen

0.19¢

for this task

29% input · 71% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.35¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 1,413 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has the largest context window here — 131K tokens.

On price, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the cheapest of the two on a typical task, at about 0.34¢.

For images or files, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B can read them directly; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is text-only.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B pricing →Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 pricing →Add Lyria 3 Clip Preview Add Grok 4.20

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at 0.34¢; ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B at 0.36¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 — 131K tokens, about 190 pages.

Can I run ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.7¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.7¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.