ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs Weaver (alpha)

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B at $0.483 in and $1.44 out and Weaver (alpha) at $0.575 in and $0.863 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Baidu

0.36¢

for a client proposal

$0.483 in · $1.44 out / 1M

123K context · released June 2025

Full page →

Weaver (alpha)

Mancer

0.36¢

for a client proposal

$0.575 in · $0.863 out / 1M

8K context · released August 2023

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.71¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

Cheapest input: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B at $0.483 per million tokens.
Cheapest output: Weaver (alpha) at $0.863 per million tokens.
Largest context: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B at 123K tokens — about 180 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

0.17¢

Weaver (alpha)

0.16¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

0.36¢

Weaver (alpha)

0.36¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

needs 155K ctx

Weaver (alpha)

needs 155K ctx

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

1.8¢

Weaver (alpha)

needs 35K ctx

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

needs 250K ctx

Weaver (alpha)

needs 250K ctx

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Weaver (alpha)

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Weaver (alpha)

Input / 1M tokens

$0.483

$0.575

Output / 1M tokens

$1.44

$0.863

Specs

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Weaver (alpha)

Provider

Baidu

Mancer

Released

June 2025

August 2023

Context window

123K

Max output

16K

Input

Images and Text

Text

Output

Text

Reasoning

Shows its thinking

Answers directly

Knowledge cutoff

2025-03-31

2023-06-30

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Baidu

0.17¢

for this task

57% input · 43% output

Full pricing →

Weaver (alpha)

Mancer

0.16¢

for this task

73% input · 27% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.33¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 1,530 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B has the largest context window here — 123K tokens.

On price they are identical: about 0.36¢ for a typical task each.

For images or files, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B can read them directly; Weaver (alpha) is text-only.

If you want to watch the model think, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B shows reasoning; the other answers directly.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B pricing →Weaver (alpha) pricing →Add Lyria 3 Clip Preview Add Grok 4.20

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B or Weaver (alpha)?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out) they cost the same — about 0.36¢ each. Compare them on context and capabilities instead.

Which has the largest context window?

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B — 123K tokens, about 180 pages.

Can I run ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B and Weaver (alpha) side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.71¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.71¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.